{"id":144,"date":"2010-08-18T13:57:57","date_gmt":"2010-08-18T12:57:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.faulder.org.uk\/genealogy\/?p=144"},"modified":"2021-11-08T13:24:58","modified_gmt":"2021-11-08T13:24:58","slug":"george-henry-williamson-b-1845-briefly-mp-for-worcester","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.faulder.org.uk\/genealogy\/?p=144","title":{"rendered":"George Henry Williamson (b 1845): Briefly MP for Worcester"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>George Henry Williamson was (in 1906) briefly elected Conservative and Unionist MP for Worcester before being disqualified.<\/p>\n<p>It was suggested that members of his team had bribed voters to vote Conservative. After a petition by the Liberal Party the result was declared void.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>The report of the election court to the Speaker of the House of Commons (<a href=\"http:\/\/hansard.millbanksystems.com\/commons\/1906\/jun\/14\/controverted-elections#S4V0158P0_19060614_HOC_2\">Hansard<\/a> 14th June 1906) said:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8230; we determined that the said George Henry Williamson, being the Member whose Election and Return were complained of in the said Petition was not duly elected and returned, and that the said Election was void.\u00a0 &#8230;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>That no corrupt or illegal practice was proved to have been committed by or with the knowledge and consent of any Candidate at the said Election.<\/li>\n<li>That the persons whose names appear in the First Schedule hereto were proved to have been guilty of the corrupt practices of bribery and treating.<\/li>\n<li>That there is reason to believe that corrupt practices have extensively prevailed at the said Election.<\/li>\n<li>That the said George Henry Williamson was guilty by his agents of the corrupt practice of bribery.<\/li>\n<li>That Certificates of Indemnity have been furnished to the persons proved guilty of bribery or treating whose names appear in the Second Schedule hereto.<\/li>\n<li>That the corrupt practices which, as there is reason to believe, extensively prevailed at the said Election were treating and the distribution of small sums, varying in amount from sixpence to two shillings and sixpence, as bribes amongst the poorer class of voters.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>As a result there was a Royal Commission set up to look into the scandal and the reports of the commission filled many columns of the Times over many weeks.\u00a0 The Royal Commission of 1906 came to the conclusion that:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<ul>\n<li>the constituency \u2018on the whole was not corrupt\u2019 as only 60 people were reported as receiving money and the total sum involved was under \u00a38 but,<\/li>\n<li>at the same time, \u2018there exists in Worcester a class of voters, numbering almost 500\u2026. who are prepared to sell their votes for drink or money\u2019 and<\/li>\n<li>that, in the Parliamentary election of 1906, \u2018corrupt practices on an organized system extensively prevailed\u2026.\u2019 <sup><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">1<\/span><\/sup><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The House of Commons refused to approve the writ for the by-election on a number of occasions &#8211; the reasoning seeming to be that the electorate was as corrupt as the political parties. (The Liberal Government may also have felt that it was not in its interest to have the by-election.)\u00a0 Attempts in the House of Commons to call the by-election failed on 17 December 1906 and 14 February 1907, but it was eventually called on 31 January 1908.<\/p>\n<p>My Grandmother used to say that her father was &#8220;nearly an MP&#8221;<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">*<\/span>.\u00a0 He was a leading businessman in Worcester, his father having founded the Providence Tinplate Works, and was Mayor of Worcester in 1893.\u00a0 He later lived in Wimbledon, but died in Bournemouth in 1918 age 73.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">*<\/span> He did in fact take his seat, which would imply that he took the oath and became an MP. Hansard reports him speaking once &#8211; proposing that &#8220;The question be now put&#8221;, the question being an amendment (proposed by Winston Spencer Churchill) to water down a motion by Mr Byles:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>That this House expresses its disapproval of the conduct of Lord Milner, as High Commissioner of South Africa and Governor of the Transvaal, in authorising the flogging of Chinese labourers in breach of the law, in violation of treaty obligations, and without the knowledge or sanction of His Majesty&#8217;s Secretary of State for the Colonies.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The speaker declined to put the question until two others had proposed that it be put; G H Williamson then voted against the amendment to the original motion. (<a href=\"http:\/\/hansard.millbanksystems.com\/commons\/1906\/mar\/21\/south-africa-high-commissioner#S4V0154P0_19060321_HOC_304\">Hansard<\/a> 21st March 1906)<\/p>\n<p><sup><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">1<\/span><\/sup> Report of the Royal Commission, paraphrased in Mylechreest, D., 2007, <em>A Singular Liberal:<br \/>\nRichard Robert Fairbairn and Worcester Politics 1899-1941 <\/em>(online at <a href=\"http:\/\/eprints.worc.ac.uk\/470\/1\/Binder1.pdf\">University of Worcester<\/a><em>) <\/em>and in Humphreys, J.H., 1911, <em>Proportional Representation A Study in Methods of Election<\/em> (online at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pdfbooks.co.za\/library\/JOHN_H._HUMPHREYS\/JOHN_H._HUMPHREYS-PROPORTIONAL_REPRESENTATION.pdf\">pdfbooks.co.za<\/a>)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>George Henry Williamson was (in 1906) briefly elected Conservative and Unionist MP for Worcester before being disqualified<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_editorskit_title_hidden":false,"_editorskit_reading_time":0,"_editorskit_is_block_options_detached":false,"_editorskit_block_options_position":"{}","footnotes":""},"categories":[66,53,131,120,79,31],"tags":[130,143,129,128,216,237,230,126,208],"class_list":["post-144","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-1837-1911","category-politics","category-scandal","category-complete","category-williamson","category-workbusiness","tag-bribes","tag-conservative","tag-election","tag-mp","tag-politics","tag-scandal","tag-williamson","tag-worcester","tag-workbusiness"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.faulder.org.uk\/genealogy\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.faulder.org.uk\/genealogy\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.faulder.org.uk\/genealogy\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.faulder.org.uk\/genealogy\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.faulder.org.uk\/genealogy\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=144"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/www.faulder.org.uk\/genealogy\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1699,"href":"https:\/\/www.faulder.org.uk\/genealogy\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144\/revisions\/1699"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.faulder.org.uk\/genealogy\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=144"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.faulder.org.uk\/genealogy\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=144"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.faulder.org.uk\/genealogy\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=144"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}